2.2 Evaluating Determinants by Row Reduction: Class Notes
Theorem 2.2.1
Let be a square matrix. If has a row of zeros or a column of zeros, then .
Theorem 2.2.2
Let be a square matrix. Then .
Theorem 2.2.3 Elementary Row Operations
Let be an matrix.
a) If is the matrix that results when a single row or single column of is multiplied by a scalar , then .
b) If is the matrix that results when two rows or two columns of are interchanged, then .
c) If is the matrix that results when a multiple of one row of is added to another or when a multiple of one column is added to another, then .
Proof of (a)
Let be the matrix that results from multiplying the th row of by . By expanding along the th row,
The entries of row of are , and has the same cofactors along row as (they are computed with row deleted, and the other rows are unchanged). So
Consider the determinant below. Its second row is 2 times the second row of the determinant on the right, so a factor of 2 comes out:
Note
Multiplying a matrix by 2 multiplies every entry: if , then . But 2 times a determinant multiplies just one row:
So , not .
Theorem 2.2.4
Let be an elementary matrix.
a) If results from multiplying a single row of by a nonzero number , then .
b) If results from interchanging two rows of , then .
c) If results from adding a multiple of one row of to another, then .
This is a special case of Theorem 2.2.3, applied to , since .
#12
Evaluate the determinant of the matrix by first reducing the matrix to row echelon form and then using some combination of row operations and cofactor expansion.
Solution
Adding a multiple of one row to another doesn’t change the determinant (Theorem 2.2.3 (c)). and :
:
Tip: Use , not : multiplying the row being replaced by 2 would also multiply the determinant by 2.
This is upper triangular, so by Theorem 2.1.2 the determinant is .
Or, with row operations: factor out of row 2 and out of row 3 (Theorem 2.2.3 (a)):
For example, call the determinant with in row 2 and the one with 1 in row 2 (before factoring ). Row 2 of is row 2 of times , so .
Answer:
#16
In #16 and 20, evaluate the determinant, given that .
Solution
This is the given determinant with . Interchanging two rows changes the sign (Theorem 2.2.3 (b)):
Answer:
#20
Solution
This comes from the given determinant by , which multiplies the determinant by 2, and , which doesn’t change the determinant. So
Answer:
Theorem 2.2.5
If is a square matrix with two proportional rows or two proportional columns, then .
Because a row operation (adding a multiple of one of the proportional rows to the other) will yield a row of zeros (or a column of zeros, for proportional columns). That row operation doesn’t change the determinant, so by Theorem 2.2.1.
Proof of Theorem 2.2.3 (b)
Mathematical induction.
Base case: . Let . Then . Let . Then .
Inductive step: Assume and that the row-interchange property holds for matrices smaller than .
Let be an matrix and be the matrix resulting from interchanging rows and of (or columns). Expanding along a row with and (row is the same in and ) uses cofactors
where and are determinants. is with two rows interchanged, and since these are of size , the induction hypothesis gives : the cofactors have opposite signs. Cofactor expansion yields .
Proof of Theorem 2.2.3 (c)
Let be the th row of . Let be the same as except that the th row () results from adding to , the th row of . Then
Since every row of other than row is the same as in , the minors and are equal for each , so and have the same cofactors along row . Expanding along row :
where is the matrix obtained by replacing the th row of with the th row of . Thus the th row of and the th row of are equal. By part (b), we can interchange rows and of to show